Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna Kalinskaya vs Laura Siegemund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kalinskaya vs Siegemund analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna Kalinskaya vs Laura Siegemund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kalinskaya 0 - 0 Siegemund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kalinskaya has won 50.83% of points on their second serve, while Siegemund has won 47.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kalinskaya, in recent form, has won 56.27% of their opponent's second serve points, while Siegemund has won 57.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.71% and 42.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kalinskaya has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siegemund has saved 54.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kalinskaya has won 66% of matches played (W/L 33/ 17), with Siegemund winning 66.04% (W/L 35/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kalinskaya has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 146/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 27/ 24). Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 339/ 181), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 125/ 120).
- Player level: In the last year, Kalinskaya has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 12/ 6), where as Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kalinskaya has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.52 while Siegemund has played against players with an average rank of 184.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kalinskaya has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siegemund has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kalinskaya has converted 42.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siegemund has converted 49.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
25
Rank
24
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
71
Rank
27
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
62% (280-170)
Career Total W/L
60% (516-347)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$2,636,582
Career Prize Money
$2,498,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kalinskaya VS Siegemund H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna Kalinskaya | Laura Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (47/27) | 57% (43/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (392/311) | 53% (371/332) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (17/6) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 65% (11/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 103 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:32 | 2:12:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.55 | 156.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1631/2357) | 75% (1712/2273) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1038/1631) | 57% (970/1712) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (369/726) | 48% (267/561) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (131/311) | 49% (160/324) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1046/2333) | 48% (1143/2373) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 69% (11/5) | 60% (9/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 60% (18/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 42% (5/12) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (23/18) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (23/5) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 43% (14/6) |
Anna Kalinskaya Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Clara Burel
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
48 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Clara Tauson
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
81%
(
76 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Carolina Kuhl
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Laura Siegemund
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Laura Siegemund
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Anna Blinkova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Laura Siegemund
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
82%
(
72 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
77 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatrice Ricci
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kalinskaya Vs Siegemund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
